JOINT TENDAJÓN
ORNELAS JAIME
With the eternal excuse of "humanitarian aid", the imperialist countries members of the Security Council United Nations and NATO armed instrument, with the complicity of international social democracy, adopted a resolution establishing a no-fly zone to immediately launch brutal attacks humanitarian missiles and air strikes on the territory of Libya.
Seizing the political crisis and civil war exist in Libya, where part of the army and the people have revolted against the authoritarian regime of Muammar Gaddafi and prolonged, the Western imperialist countries involved in Libya on the grounds prevent a slaughter, an argument that if true would have driven to act in a while. With this brutal intervention, as only the civilized nations of the West know it, they can do and they've always done, it is not meet the social and economic demands can legitimately raise the Libyan people, in fact, intervention military has only one purpose: to ensure control over oil wealth of the victimized country.
is likely that the Western powers, as Christians, as democratic, they were only waiting for Kadafi popular revolution defeated then intervene and overthrow him, putting in place someone who was so close to the interests Europeans and Americans, as at the time it was Gaddafi himself.
In any case, NATO intervention in Libya does not seek to support the Libyan revolutionary, but wants to keep control of the country, mainly from the oil coats impose a docile government that will allow European and U.S. companies plunder, as they did throughout the Gaddafi regime, its oil wealth, moreover, is not far off the possibility of NATO intervention has the strategic intent to prevent the processes democratization that have opened in the Middle East, such as Tunisia, Egypt, Bahrain and Yemen, they become a threat to Western hegemony in the region.
Apart from the assessments that have about the despotic regime of Gaddafi, who no doubt long forgotten nationalist and imperialist origin, is inadmissible Western military intervention. The experience of Iraq and Afghanistan should not be repeated, because in addition to violating the right of peoples to self-determination, intervention means, has meant a systematic violation of human rights and the loss of sovereignty. The story of the last century is full of similar experiences in which the imperialists disguised as "humanitarian Democrats' internal processes involved in actual or fictitious dictators, only to impose puppet governments to ensure the delivery of natural resources to private capital.
Kadafi should go, he had to go long, but the interests held by allying of the capitals of the countries that now want him out of Libya. It must be because they decided the population has been massacred with guns "made in USA" or made in France or England, it does not matter, they are the same weapons as provided by those countries allowed the despot remain in power against the will of the people for over four long decades.
From what if your are sure of is that imperialism never brought democracy to any nation, but on the contrary, the lack of democracy and the cancellation of self-determination always added the malicious intention of looting of natural resources colonized countries' human. From what I'm confident is that imperialism intervenes where it does not safeguard human rights, but to establish schemes where the least important is the respect for these rights and whether consensual or repressive control over the population.
If history teaches anything it is to reject military intervention as the lag in Libya today.
Do you really believe that Felipe Calderón Hinojosa to leave the messenger change reality?
Source: La Jornada de Oriente
0 comments:
Post a Comment