Thursday, March 24, 2011

Ontario Rst On Private Sale Of Boat

The PRD had its chance to compose and lost


ROBERTO RAMIREZ BRAVO

For writer Paco Ignacio Taibo II, the PRD had the opportunity to compose the last weekend (when it renewed its national leadership) and the lost. " Now, he said in an interview "is a party of officials and bureaucrats."

Political
leftist labor activist, writer, Taibo interview analyzes the current situation and left the PRD in Mexico, and in the case Guerrero says, Angel Aguirre the governor-elect will have all the pressure, "including leaving his head" to move to the right, and if there is a leftist party that is pushing it, there will be no pressure to move toward that side of the political spectrum.

And it says, state governments arising from the PRD-led coalition, have transformed societies which have emerged. The author of Pancho Villa, a narrative biography, including about 50 degrees, uses a space to visit the La Jornada Guerrero during the filming of a documentary on the life of John R. Escudero, the Socialist mayor of Acapulco in the 20's of last century.

"I think," says the PRD input and not made up. "

The opportunity lost it in the National Council last weekend, "because the party that was represented in this council, not a militant left-wing party is a party of employees, and what was there is no longer represented the foundation he founded the PRD, and the attempt to have a party to change to Mexico. "

His vision of the PRD is not optimistic: "There is not militancy, only cliques stagnant in province only without representation, many PRI governors cents or PAN mayors, people who get paid by the military, lacking social base. And that game, of course, what does? Bureaucrat bureaucrat vote for, vote for dog dog, "he explains.

Unlike the country that "has been moved to the left, the PRD party bureaucracy" has been moved to the right, "he said.

"It is clear that the dogs have a deal with Calderón. It is a covenant without principles. How on earth can be allied with someone with whom you disagree on fundamental problems? The management of the oil economy, are in complete disagreement. The handling of the economy in general, the way they are here as if we were slaves to rope the International Monetary Fund's policy drug war, a damn Calderonian delirium, which is worth mother that has cost lives; the politics of minority rights: abortion, gay rights of minorities, protection of the elderly. PAN had better mothers. How can you agree with a party with which they have serious contradictions in these things? "

This policy of alliance with the National Action" will burn the remains of the bureaucracy. "

even proposed to burn leftists credentials of the PRD in the base of Mexico City and found a party "real left, where you meet people on the left who wants military wants no bone , money, space and is there for the chamba "because" the party no longer represents a desire for change. "

- envision a formal break?

"Yes. In principle, I'm gonna burn my card. He had not burned so far because he did not find, I had lost, but now burn into the socket. I'll call my friends, and (I will) on Wednesday, or Thursday. And give me time, because these things are in their time. I'll burn my credential PRD, these guys do not represent me, do not represent the ideas of the left.

- And López Obrador, all the people who have moved to the National Regeneration Movement (Morena), should direct that rupture?

"I think that Brown has his own calendar, its own proposal. The brunette is a political-electoral phenomenon interesting, I agree with many of the things they say Lopez (Obrador) and Morena, but lacks the clumping which gives a party that makes everyday politics. Morena seems that their logic is: we are four million, together with other five, multiply by ... I think there is a possibility of rebuilding a party left of the PRD, and it is necessary. I do not feel comfortable with the PT or Convergence. They have many buts out there in the past and for that I feel comfortable with them. Of course I do not feel comfortable in the PRD, and I think many of us in that attitude and we want our own space, beyond that converge later in the Morena, Morena or belong to, I see no contradiction in that.

"The Brown is now the main umbrella of the Left movement. If not it was around the establishment of a new party, then why where?

"I think it would on the other hand, because the problem of a party not only an election can be raised as an end goal. A new party has to consider the work of solidarity, organizational development, educational work, cultural policy work, solidarity with social movements, beyond which you may or may not belong to Brown and joins the Morena. In terms of the ballot, it seems to me the most consistent of which is in the air, the healthiest, but I do believe that many people in the party that feels it needs a space for expression and is not found.

Guerrero, yes, but not

Guerrero
"You know, how you see the situation here, which just won the election Angel Aguirre, a former PRI?

"I think it was a step in one direction, but it sounds a little. Where is the social program? I want to see. So far there have been many governors emerged from coalitions that promoted the PRD, where are your social programs? How have the companies in which they arise? The answer is: they have not changed, have negotiated with the regime's economic policy, negotiated in the social with the regime. Why are not the murderers in prison in Oaxaca? Why in Chiapas there was a healthy relationship with the Zapatistas, recognizing the San Andrés accords? Why Baja California, years of PRD did not mean for social change, but meant a policy of development in the traditional logic of capitalism that arise fucking oral dams, as if that progress? I do believe that these semi PRD governments have resulted in fact very conservative, and it takes a political choice on the left.

- Could the case of Angel Aguirre Rivero?

"I think so. Pressure to move to the right, will have all, including those coming out of his own head. Pressure to move to the left, if there is a match if no party is pushing, not going to be. When I say move to the left is putting forward the interests of farmers, not the oligarchs.

-A portion of the state leadership has already accommodated in the cabinet.

"Always happens that: bureaucrat looking chair, is a law of life. That raised the article published Saturday in La Jornada. How can you convert to a leftist party in a can of sardines? Very simple: return employees to their members, convert them into a van looking carruselito where positions, remove any ideological content, and when you say, what about the program?, Say, what channel?

- Does Parota?

"Clearly, there is a willingness from the bottom of society, saying no, and there's a will from above rather obscure interests managed by saying yes. Define yourself to that.

"For a moment Angel Aguirre said no, then yes.

"We need a left-wing party that happens to tell you this, this and this, and these are the reasons for citizens to say no, what are the reasons for the power to say yes? Let him say: "Look, we're two sons of bitches, but there is money involved," it says.

Source: La Jornada de Guerrero

0 comments:

Post a Comment